I am not a big Pat Buchanan fan. Mostly because I think hie personality is a little harsh and I strongly disagree with him on immigration.
however this is hits the nail on the head. read it.
I particularly like this because it is dead on.
"Normally, the press is reluctant to rummage into the private lives of public servants, unless their conduct affects their duties or they preach virtues they hypocritically do not practice.
Yet, no sooner was Palin introduced, than the media went berserk over the news that her 17-year-old daughter is pregnant. As one in three births in America is out-of-wedlock and Hollywood celebrates this lifestyle, why did The New York Times and The Washington Post splash this "news" on page one above the fold?
How does Bristol Palin's pregnancy disqualify Sarah Palin to be vice president? Why is it even relevant?
They did it because they thought it would damage Sarah Palin in the eyes of a Christian community they do not comprehend."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment